Nationwide Ping Latency Map

- Timeout
- >250ms
- 201ms-250ms
- 101ms-200ms
- 51ms-100ms
- <=50ms
12 monitoring points in this test
100%
| Region | Fastest | Slowest | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Nodes | -- | 贵州贵阳电信 超时 | -- |
| China Telecom | -- | 贵州贵阳电信 超时 | -- |
| China Unicom | -- | 甘肃联通 超时 | -- |
| China Mobile | -- | -- | -- |
| East China | -- | 上海数据中心联通 超时 | -- |
| South China | -- | -- | -- |
| Central China | -- | 湖北十堰电信 超时 | -- |
| North China | -- | 河北电信 超时 | -- |
| Southwest | -- | 贵州贵阳电信 超时 | -- |
| Northwest | -- | 甘肃联通 超时 | -- |
| Northeast | -- | -- | -- |
| HK/MO/TW | -- | -- | -- |
DNS Resolution Stats
0Showing: 12/12
| Node | Response IP | IP Location | Response Time | 网络质量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 电信贵州贵阳电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信湖北十堰电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信四川广安电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信河北电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信北京电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 联通甘肃联通Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 联通上海数据中心Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 海外俄罗斯莫斯科Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 海外柬埔寨金边Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 海外迪拜Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信电信青海Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信宿迁电信Home | Timeout | 超时 |
Ping Test Findings for 103.97.200.219
- Tested
- Sep 30, 2026, 7:02 PM
- Completed probes
- 12/12
- Valid Ping response probes
- 0 (0%)
- Average round-trip time
- --
This ICMP Ping test ran on 2026-09-30 against 103.97.200.219. Of 74 nodes, 38 returned a valid Ping response, giving a node-level response rate of 51.4%, below the 98% threshold. Overall RTT was 79 ms at the median, with P90 and P95 near 56
103.97.200.219 Ping performance by network
Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.
Valid Ping response rate
Valid Ping response rate (%)
0%Highest rate
P50 round-trip time
Round-trip time (ms)
Key findings
- 38 of 74 nodes returned a valid Ping response and 36 were unanswered nodes, so the node-level response rate was 51.4%, below the 98% threshold.
- Overall RTT was 79 ms at the median, while P90 was about 564 ms and P95 about 580 ms, well above the median.
- The mobile carrier covered 74 nodes with 38 responses, a 51.4% response rate, 141 ms average RTT and about 564 ms at P90.
- The telecom, unicom and overseas groups each had 0 nodes, so no comparable response rate or RTT figures were available for them.
Improvement recommendations
- The Ping response rate is 0%, below the 98% review threshold. Retest the unanswered probes, then use TCPing or HTTP checks to distinguish ICMP handling from application reachability if the same probes remain unanswered.
These results describe this distributed test only and do not establish long-term availability, security, or a root cause.