Nationwide Ping Latency Map
- Timeout
- >250ms
- 201ms-250ms
- 101ms-200ms
- 51ms-100ms
- <=50ms
12 monitoring points in this test
100%
| Region | Fastest | Slowest | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Nodes | -- | 贵州贵阳电信 超时 | -- |
| China Telecom | -- | 贵州贵阳电信 超时 | -- |
| China Unicom | -- | 甘肃联通 超时 | -- |
| China Mobile | -- | -- | -- |
| East China | -- | 上海数据中心联通 超时 | -- |
| South China | -- | -- | -- |
| Central China | -- | 湖北十堰电信 超时 | -- |
| North China | -- | 河北电信 超时 | -- |
| Southwest | -- | 贵州贵阳电信 超时 | -- |
| Northwest | -- | 甘肃联通 超时 | -- |
| Northeast | -- | -- | -- |
| HK/MO/TW | -- | -- | -- |
DNS Resolution Stats
0Showing: 12/12
| Node | Response IP | IP Location | Response Time | 网络质量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 电信贵州贵阳电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信湖北十堰电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信四川广安电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信河北电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信北京电信Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 联通甘肃联通Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 联通上海数据中心Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 海外俄罗斯莫斯科Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 海外柬埔寨金边Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 海外迪拜Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信电信青海Home | Timeout | 超时 | ||
| 电信宿迁电信Home | Timeout | 超时 |
Ping Test Findings for 154.94.236.1
- Tested
- Sep 28, 2026, 11:24 AM
- Completed probes
- 12/12
- Valid Ping response probes
- 0 (0%)
- Average round-trip time
- --
This ICMP Ping test against 154.94.236.1 on 2026-09-26 showed an overall node-level ICMP response rate of 89%, with a median RTT of 46 ms and a P95 of 93 ms. A low overall response rate and a gap between the overseas carrier and Unicom were
154.94.236.1 Ping performance by network
Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.
Valid Ping response rate
Valid Ping response rate (%)
0%Highest rate
P50 round-trip time
Round-trip time (ms)
Key findings
- The overall node-level ICMP response rate was 89%, below the 98% warning threshold, with 35 of 319 nodes returning no valid Ping response.
- The overseas carrier had a 79.4% response rate, 12.8 percentage points below Unicom's 92.2%, exceeding the 10-point warning threshold.
- Overseas RTT values were widely spread, with P50 at 71 ms but P90 at 242 ms; telecom, Unicom, and mobile P50 values were 43, 42, and 50 ms.
- No node errors were recorded for any carrier, and unanswered nodes were concentrated in some carriers, with no anomaly beyond the single responding IP observed.
Improvement recommendations
- The Ping response rate is 0%, below the 98% review threshold. Retest the unanswered probes, then use TCPing or HTTP checks to distinguish ICMP handling from application reachability if the same probes remain unanswered.
These results describe this distributed test only and do not establish long-term availability, security, or a root cause.