199.232.161.42 Ping

Carrier
DNS

Nationwide Ping Latency Map

Nationwide Ping Latency Map
  • Timeout
  • >250ms
  • 201ms-250ms
  • 101ms-200ms
  • 51ms-100ms
  • <=50ms
100%
RegionFastestSlowestAverage
All Nodes江西赣州电信 16ms北京电信 超时125ms
China Telecom江西赣州电信 16ms北京电信 超时125ms
China Unicom------
China Mobile------
East China江西赣州电信 16ms上海徐汇电信 超时101ms
South China广东佛山电信 57ms广西贵港电信 超时94ms
Central China湖南株洲电信 65ms河南三门峡电信 超时145ms
North China河北电信 70.3ms北京电信 超时164ms
Southwest贵州黔南电信 77ms贵州贵阳电信 超时153ms
Northwest陕西咸阳电信 40ms甘肃兰州电信 超时162ms
Northeast辽宁辽阳电信 88ms吉林辽源电信 109ms95ms
HK/MO/TW------

DNS Resolution Stats

1

Showing: 124/124

NodeResponse IPIP LocationResponse Time网络质量
电信北京电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信北京电信日本/东京都/东京/Fastly, Inc.236ms较慢
电信天津电信日本/东京/fastly.com/224ms较慢
电信上海徐汇电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信上海奉贤电信日本/东京/fastly.com/247ms较慢
电信上海黄浦电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信重庆黔江电信日本/东京/fastly.com/274ms较慢
电信重庆江津电信日本/东京/fastly.com/91ms良好
电信重庆两江电信日本/东京/fastly.com/304ms较慢
电信河北石家庄电信日本/东京/fastly.com/73ms良好
电信河北邢台电信日本/东京/fastly.com/97ms良好
电信河北唐山电信日本/东京/fastly.com/111ms一般
电信河北电信日本/东京都/东京/Fastly, Inc.70.3ms良好
电信河南三门峡电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信河南商丘电信日本/东京/fastly.com/88ms良好
电信河南郑州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/73ms良好
电信河南开封电信日本/东京/fastly.com/105ms一般
电信河南驻马店电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信河南漯河电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信河南南阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/81ms良好
电信河南信阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/67ms良好
电信云南昆明电信日本/东京/fastly.com/87ms良好
电信云南文山电信日本/东京/fastly.com/87ms良好
电信辽宁辽阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/88ms良好
电信辽宁铁岭电信日本/东京/fastly.com/89ms良好
电信辽宁沈阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/91ms良好
电信辽宁鞍山电信日本/东京/fastly.com/90ms良好
电信辽宁盘锦电信日本/东京/fastly.com/89ms良好
电信黑龙江鸡西电信日本/东京/fastly.com/106ms一般
电信湖南郴州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/238ms较慢
电信湖南长沙电信日本/东京/fastly.com/245ms较慢
电信湖南衡阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/75ms良好
电信湖南株洲电信日本/东京/fastly.com/65ms良好
电信湖南邵阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/65ms良好
电信岳阳电信电信日本/东京/fastly.com/100ms良好
电信安徽池州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信安徽滁州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/67ms良好
电信安徽黄山电信日本/东京/fastly.com/80ms良好
电信安徽安庆电信日本/东京/fastly.com/73ms良好
电信安徽淮南电信日本/东京/fastly.com/65ms良好
电信安徽合肥电信日本/东京/fastly.com/82ms良好
电信安徽马鞍山电信日本/东京/fastly.com/66ms良好
电信安徽合肥电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信安徽芜湖电信日本/东京/fastly.com/162ms一般
电信山东青岛1电信日本/东京/fastly.com/178ms一般
电信山东枣庄电信日本/东京/fastly.com/92ms良好
电信山东济南电信日本/东京/fastly.com/56ms良好
电信山东龙口电信日本/东京/fastly.com/105ms一般
电信山东青岛电信日本/东京/fastly.com/97ms良好
电信山东枣庄电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信新疆乌鲁木齐电信日本/东京/fastly.com/343ms较慢
电信江苏苏州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/83ms良好
电信江苏宿迁电信日本/东京/fastly.com/94ms良好
电信江苏盐城电信日本/东京/fastly.com/59ms良好
电信江苏泰州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/104ms一般
电信江苏连云港电信日本/东京/fastly.com/106ms一般
电信江苏徐州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/243ms较慢
电信江苏无锡电信日本/东京/fastly.com/42ms优秀
电信江苏南通电信日本/东京/fastly.com/99ms良好
电信江苏南京电信日本/东京/fastly.com/233ms较慢
电信宿迁电信日本/东京都/东京/Fastly, Inc.178ms一般
电信浙江宁波电信日本/东京/fastly.com/53ms良好
电信浙江杭州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/223ms较慢
电信浙江嘉兴电信日本/东京/fastly.com/76ms良好
电信浙江绍兴电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信浙江温州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/87ms良好
电信浙江衢州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/57ms良好
电信浙江丽水电信日本/东京/fastly.com/72ms良好
电信江西南昌电信日本/东京/fastly.com/81ms良好
电信江西吉安电信日本/东京/fastly.com/73ms良好
电信江西赣州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/16ms优秀
电信湖北十堰电信日本/东京/fastly.com/235ms较慢
电信湖北武汉电信日本/东京/fastly.com/230ms较慢
电信湖北咸宁电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信湖北襄阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/259ms较慢
电信湖北十堰电信日本/东京都/东京/Fastly, Inc.246ms较慢
电信广西贵港电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信广西南宁电信日本/东京/fastly.com/64ms良好
电信广西南宁1电信日本/东京/fastly.com/176ms一般
电信广西玉林电信日本/东京/fastly.com/82ms良好
电信广西柳州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/77ms良好
电信甘肃兰州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信甘肃平凉电信日本/东京/fastly.com/111ms一般
电信甘肃武威电信日本/东京/fastly.com/98ms良好
电信甘肃庆阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/105ms一般
电信山西晋中电信日本/东京/fastly.com/289ms较慢
电信内蒙古呼和浩特电信日本/东京/fastly.com/235ms较慢
电信内蒙古巴彦淖尔电信日本/东京/fastly.com/101ms一般
电信内蒙古包头电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信内蒙古呼和浩特电信日本/东京/fastly.com/199ms一般
电信陕西西安1电信日本/东京/fastly.com/89ms良好
电信陕西咸阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/40ms优秀
电信陕西渭南电信日本/东京/fastly.com/105ms一般
电信陕西西安电信日本/东京/fastly.com/88ms良好
电信吉林辽源电信日本/东京/fastly.com/109ms一般
电信吉林松原电信日本/东京/fastly.com/95ms良好
电信福建福州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信福建厦门电信日本/东京/fastly.com/77ms良好
电信福建漳州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/67ms良好
电信福建三明电信日本/东京/fastly.com/78ms良好
电信福建宁德电信日本/东京/fastly.com/83ms良好
电信福建泉州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/84ms良好
电信贵州贵阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/184ms一般
电信贵州黔南电信日本/东京/fastly.com/77ms良好
电信贵州贵阳电信--Timeout超时
电信广东揭阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/256ms较慢
电信广东佛山电信日本/东京/fastly.com/57ms良好
电信广东清远电信日本/东京/fastly.com/60ms良好
电信广东湛江电信日本/东京/fastly.com/73ms良好
电信广东广州电信日本/东京/fastly.com/57ms良好
电信青海西宁电信日本/东京/fastly.com/251ms较慢
电信青海海东电信日本/东京/fastly.com/251ms较慢
电信电信青海日本/东京都/东京/Fastly, Inc.266ms较慢
电信西藏拉萨1电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信西藏拉萨电信日本/东京/fastly.com/Timeout超时
电信西藏山南电信日本/东京/fastly.com/127ms一般
电信四川成都电信日本/东京/fastly.com/229ms较慢
电信四川自贡电信日本/东京/fastly.com/96ms良好
电信四川绵阳电信日本/东京/fastly.com/90ms良好
电信四川广安电信日本/东京都/东京/Fastly, Inc.191ms一般
电信宁夏银川电信日本/东京/fastly.com/111ms一般
电信宁夏中卫电信日本/东京/fastly.com/249ms较慢
电信海南三亚电信日本/东京/fastly.com/65ms良好
电信海南海口电信日本/东京/fastly.com/64ms良好

Ping Test Findings for 199.232.161.42

Tested
Oct 25, 2026, 9:49 PM
Completed probes
124/124
Valid Ping response probes
106 (85.5%)
Average round-trip time
125 ms

This ICMP Ping run saw 106 of 124 nodes return a valid Ping response, an overall response rate of 85.5%, below the 98% reference threshold; among responding nodes the median RTT was 91 ms and the 95th percentile 258 ms.

199.232.161.42 Ping performance by network

Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Valid Ping response rate

Valid Ping response rate (%)

85.5%Highest rate
Valid Ping response rateValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.050100Telecom: 85.5%85.5%Telecom

P50 round-trip time

Round-trip time (ms)

91 msLowest P50
P50 round-trip timeValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.050100Telecom: 91 ms91 msTelecom
Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Key findings

  • 106 of 124 nodes returned a valid Ping response; 18 nodes were unanswered, giving a node-level response rate of 85.5%.
  • The telecom group covered all 124 nodes with the same 85.5% response rate, a median RTT of 91 ms, a 90th percentile of 247 ms and a 95th percentile of 258 ms.
  • The unicom, mobile and overseas groups each had 0 nodes, so no comparison data was available for them in this run.

Improvement recommendations

  • The Ping response rate is 85.5%, below the 98% review threshold. Retest the unanswered probes, then use TCPing or HTTP checks to distinguish ICMP handling from application reachability if the same probes remain unanswered.

These results describe this distributed test only and do not establish long-term availability, security, or a root cause.