94.140.14.59 Ping

Carrier
DNS

Nationwide Ping Latency Map

Nationwide Ping Latency Map
  • Timeout
  • >250ms
  • 201ms-250ms
  • 101ms-200ms
  • 51ms-100ms
  • <=50ms
100%
RegionFastestSlowestAverage
All Nodes澳门 0ms辽宁鞍山电信 超时325ms
China Telecom海南海口电信 3ms辽宁鞍山电信 超时384ms
China Unicom贵州黔南联通 74ms上海数据中心联通 超时213ms
China Mobile河北唐山移动 31ms甘肃庆阳移动 2969ms357ms
East China安徽合肥移动 44ms江苏无锡电信 超时326ms
South China海南海口电信 3ms广西玉林移动 2707ms387ms
Central China河南郑州1联通 154ms湖北十堰电信 249ms209ms
North China山西晋中电信 14ms山西晋中1电信 2731ms322ms
Southwest贵州黔南联通 74ms重庆江津移动 322ms213ms
Northwest甘肃平凉联通 75ms甘肃庆阳移动 2969ms592ms
Northeast辽宁鞍山联通 147ms辽宁鞍山电信 超时350ms
HK/MO/TW澳门 0ms台湾高雄 13ms5ms

DNS Resolution Stats

1

Showing: 320/320

NodeResponse IPIP LocationResponse Time网络质量
电信天津电信Anycast/adguard.com//199ms一般
电信上海徐汇电信Anycast/adguard.com//215ms较慢
电信上海奉贤电信Anycast/adguard.com//213ms较慢
电信上海普陀电信Anycast/adguard.com//212ms较慢
电信重庆黔江电信Anycast/adguard.com//220ms较慢
电信重庆江津电信Anycast/adguard.com//249ms较慢
电信重庆两江电信Anycast/adguard.com//212ms较慢
电信河北石家庄1电信Anycast/adguard.com//193ms一般
电信河北邢台电信Anycast/adguard.com//198ms一般
电信河北唐山电信Anycast/adguard.com//94ms良好
电信河北石家庄电信Anycast/adguard.com//262ms较慢
电信河北电信塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited201ms较慢
电信河南三门峡电信Anycast/adguard.com//224ms较慢
电信河南郑州2电信Anycast/adguard.com//216ms较慢
电信河南商丘电信Anycast/adguard.com//203ms较慢
电信河南平顶山电信Anycast/adguard.com//203ms较慢
电信河南南阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//204ms较慢
电信河南郑州电信Anycast/adguard.com//207ms较慢
电信河南开封电信Anycast/adguard.com//206ms较慢
电信河南驻马店电信Anycast/adguard.com//221ms较慢
电信河南漯河电信Anycast/adguard.com//228ms较慢
电信云南昆明电信Anycast/adguard.com//234ms较慢
电信云南昭通电信Anycast/adguard.com//225ms较慢
电信云南文山电信Anycast/adguard.com//249ms较慢
电信云南昆明1电信Anycast/adguard.com//250ms较慢
电信云南楚雄电信Anycast/adguard.com//239ms较慢
电信辽宁辽阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//173ms一般
电信辽宁铁岭电信Anycast/adguard.com//174ms一般
电信辽宁沈阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//207ms较慢
电信辽宁鞍山电信Anycast/adguard.com//Timeout超时
电信黑龙江鸡西电信Anycast/adguard.com//225ms较慢
电信湖南郴州电信Anycast/adguard.com//202ms较慢
电信湖南长沙电信Anycast/adguard.com//224ms较慢
电信湖南衡阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//228ms较慢
电信湖南邵阳1电信Anycast/adguard.com//239ms较慢
电信湖南株洲电信Anycast/adguard.com//204ms较慢
电信湖南长沙1电信Anycast/adguard.com//195ms一般
电信湖南岳阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//208ms较慢
电信湖南邵阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//243ms较慢
电信安徽芜湖电信Anycast/adguard.com//208ms较慢
电信安徽池州电信Anycast/adguard.com//219ms较慢
电信安徽滁州电信Anycast/adguard.com//2723ms很慢
电信安徽黄山电信Anycast/adguard.com//200ms一般
电信安徽安庆电信Anycast/adguard.com//219ms较慢
电信安徽淮南电信Anycast/adguard.com//185ms一般
电信安徽合肥电信Anycast/adguard.com//179ms一般
电信安徽马鞍山电信Anycast/adguard.com//207ms较慢
电信安徽合肥电信Anycast/adguard.com//245ms较慢
电信山东青岛电信Anycast/adguard.com//185ms一般
电信山东烟台电信Anycast/adguard.com//278ms较慢
电信山东枣庄电信Anycast/adguard.com//203ms较慢
电信山东济南电信Anycast/adguard.com//237ms较慢
电信山东龙口电信Anycast/adguard.com//187ms一般
电信山东青岛电信Anycast/adguard.com//225ms较慢
电信新疆乌鲁木齐电信Anycast/adguard.com//239ms较慢
电信江苏苏州电信Anycast/adguard.com//2715ms很慢
电信江苏宿迁电信Anycast/adguard.com//201ms较慢
电信江苏盐城电信Anycast/adguard.com//177ms一般
电信江苏泰州电信Anycast/adguard.com//191ms一般
电信江苏连云港电信Anycast/adguard.com//197ms一般
电信江苏徐州电信Anycast/adguard.com//178ms一般
电信江苏无锡电信Anycast/adguard.com//Timeout超时
电信江苏盐城1电信Anycast/adguard.com//175ms一般
电信江苏南通电信Anycast/adguard.com//213ms较慢
电信江苏南京电信Anycast/adguard.com//2709ms很慢
电信苏州电信塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited192ms一般
电信浙江宁波电信Anycast/adguard.com//231ms较慢
电信浙江杭州电信Anycast/adguard.com//233ms较慢
电信浙江嘉兴电信Anycast/adguard.com//202ms较慢
电信浙江丽水电信Anycast/adguard.com//205ms较慢
电信浙江金华电信Anycast/adguard.com//239ms较慢
电信浙江绍兴电信Anycast/adguard.com//204ms较慢
电信浙江温州1电信Anycast/adguard.com//222ms较慢
电信浙江温州电信Anycast/adguard.com//240ms较慢
电信浙江衢州电信Anycast/adguard.com//2476ms很慢
电信浙江衢州电信Anycast/adguard.com//216ms较慢
电信江西南昌电信Anycast/adguard.com//249ms较慢
电信江西吉安电信Anycast/adguard.com//215ms较慢
电信江西赣州电信Anycast/adguard.com//225ms较慢
电信湖北襄阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//230ms较慢
电信湖北十堰电信Anycast/adguard.com//249ms较慢
电信湖北武汉电信Anycast/adguard.com//224ms较慢
电信湖北十堰电信塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited195ms一般
电信广西贵港电信Anycast/adguard.com//221ms较慢
电信广西柳州电信Anycast/adguard.com//105ms一般
电信广西南宁电信Anycast/adguard.com//212ms较慢
电信广西南宁1电信Anycast/adguard.com//196ms一般
电信广西玉林电信Anycast/adguard.com//238ms较慢
电信甘肃兰州电信Anycast/adguard.com//215ms较慢
电信甘肃庆阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//183ms一般
电信甘肃庆阳1电信Anycast/adguard.com//228ms较慢
电信甘肃平凉电信Anycast/adguard.com//2736ms很慢
电信山西太原电信Anycast/adguard.com//203ms较慢
电信山西晋中1电信Anycast/adguard.com//2731ms很慢
电信山西晋中2电信Anycast/adguard.com//205ms较慢
电信山西晋中电信Anycast/adguard.com//14ms优秀
电信内蒙古呼和浩特电信Anycast/adguard.com//200ms一般
电信内蒙古巴彦淖尔电信Anycast/adguard.com//221ms较慢
电信内蒙古包头电信Anycast/adguard.com//219ms较慢
电信陕西西安1电信Anycast/adguard.com//161ms一般
电信陕西渭南电信Anycast/adguard.com//2731ms很慢
电信陕西西安电信Anycast/adguard.com//156ms一般
电信吉林辽源电信Anycast/adguard.com//210ms较慢
电信吉林松原电信Anycast/adguard.com//2963ms很慢
电信福建福州电信Anycast/adguard.com//227ms较慢
电信福建厦门电信Anycast/adguard.com//231ms较慢
电信福建漳州电信Anycast/adguard.com//226ms较慢
电信福建三明电信Anycast/adguard.com//249ms较慢
电信福建宁德电信Anycast/adguard.com//251ms较慢
电信福建泉州电信Anycast/adguard.com//229ms较慢
电信贵州贵阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//235ms较慢
电信贵州黔南电信Anycast/adguard.com//101ms一般
电信贵州贵阳电信塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited229ms较慢
电信广东广州电信Anycast/adguard.com//232ms较慢
电信广东揭阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//216ms较慢
电信广东佛山电信Anycast/adguard.com//231ms较慢
电信广东广州电信Anycast/adguard.com//228ms较慢
电信广东韶关电信Anycast/adguard.com//234ms较慢
电信广东湛江电信Anycast/adguard.com//254ms较慢
电信青海西宁电信Anycast/adguard.com//222ms较慢
电信青海海东电信Anycast/adguard.com//184ms一般
电信青海西宁电信Anycast/adguard.com//221ms较慢
电信电信青海塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited220ms较慢
电信西藏拉萨1电信Anycast/adguard.com//203ms较慢
电信西藏拉萨电信Anycast/adguard.com//241ms较慢
电信四川绵阳电信Anycast/adguard.com//252ms较慢
电信四川成都电信Anycast/adguard.com//239ms较慢
电信四川自贡电信Anycast/adguard.com//259ms较慢
电信四川广安电信塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited226ms较慢
电信海南三亚电信Anycast/adguard.com//2696ms很慢
电信海南海口电信Anycast/adguard.com//3ms优秀
电信北京电信塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited207ms较慢
联通北京联通Anycast/adguard.com//128ms一般
联通天津联通Anycast/adguard.com//195ms一般
联通上海联通Anycast/adguard.com//201ms较慢
联通上海数据中心--Timeout超时
联通重庆联通Anycast/adguard.com//165ms一般
联通河北邯郸联通Anycast/adguard.com//139ms一般
联通河北邢台联通Anycast/adguard.com//199ms一般
联通河北唐山联通Anycast/adguard.com//146ms一般
联通河南开封联通Anycast/adguard.com//207ms较慢
联通河南洛阳联通Anycast/adguard.com//218ms较慢
联通河南平顶山联通Anycast/adguard.com//201ms较慢
联通河南漯河联通Anycast/adguard.com//229ms较慢
联通河南商丘联通Anycast/adguard.com//211ms较慢
联通河南驻马店联通Anycast/adguard.com//157ms一般
联通河南郑州联通Anycast/adguard.com//214ms较慢
联通河南郑州1联通Anycast/adguard.com//154ms一般
联通云南曲靖联通Anycast/adguard.com//210ms较慢
联通云南昆明联通Anycast/adguard.com//79ms良好
联通辽宁铁岭联通Anycast/adguard.com//191ms一般
联通辽宁沈阳联通Anycast/adguard.com//158ms一般
联通辽宁抚顺联通Anycast/adguard.com//206ms较慢
联通辽宁鞍山联通Anycast/adguard.com//147ms一般
联通黑龙江鸡西联通Anycast/adguard.com//207ms较慢
联通湖南岳阳联通Anycast/adguard.com//192ms一般
联通湖南永州联通Anycast/adguard.com//182ms一般
联通湖南邵阳1联通Anycast/adguard.com//240ms较慢
联通湖南衡阳联通Anycast/adguard.com//178ms一般
联通湖南邵阳联通Anycast/adguard.com//166ms一般
联通安徽芜湖联通Anycast/adguard.com//165ms一般
联通安徽滁州联通Anycast/adguard.com//191ms一般
联通安徽马鞍山联通Anycast/adguard.com//215ms较慢
联通山东龙口联通Anycast/adguard.com//150ms一般
联通山东济宁联通Anycast/adguard.com//139ms一般
联通山东枣庄联通Anycast/adguard.com//189ms一般
联通山东青岛联通Anycast/adguard.com//141ms一般
联通山东菏泽联通Anycast/adguard.com//146ms一般
联通江苏苏州联通Anycast/adguard.com//155ms一般
联通江苏盐城联通Anycast/adguard.com//154ms一般
联通江苏徐州联通Anycast/adguard.com//162ms一般
联通江苏南京联通Anycast/adguard.com//142ms一般
联通浙江宁波联通Anycast/adguard.com//166ms一般
联通浙江杭州联通Anycast/adguard.com//232ms较慢
联通浙江温州1联通Anycast/adguard.com//166ms一般
联通浙江温州联通Anycast/adguard.com//194ms一般
联通浙江杭州联通Anycast/adguard.com//231ms较慢
联通江西南昌联通Anycast/adguard.com//154ms一般
联通湖北恩施联通Anycast/adguard.com//198ms一般
联通广西贵港联通Anycast/adguard.com//185ms一般
联通甘肃兰州联通Anycast/adguard.com//193ms一般
联通甘肃庆阳联通Anycast/adguard.com//172ms一般
联通甘肃平凉1联通Anycast/adguard.com//251ms较慢
联通甘肃平凉联通Anycast/adguard.com//75ms良好
联通甘肃联通塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited165ms一般
联通山西长治联通Anycast/adguard.com//188ms一般
联通山西晋中联通Anycast/adguard.com//79ms良好
联通山西运城联通Anycast/adguard.com//189ms一般
联通内蒙古包头联通Anycast/adguard.com//245ms较慢
联通内蒙古赤峰联通Anycast/adguard.com//231ms较慢
联通陕西西安联通Anycast/adguard.com//196ms一般
联通陕西渭南联通Anycast/adguard.com//236ms较慢
联通吉林辽源联通Anycast/adguard.com//225ms较慢
联通吉林梅河口联通Anycast/adguard.com//179ms一般
联通吉林通化联通Anycast/adguard.com//199ms一般
联通福建厦门联通Anycast/adguard.com//188ms一般
联通福建宁德联通Anycast/adguard.com//169ms一般
联通福建福州联通Anycast/adguard.com//169ms一般
联通贵州贵阳联通Anycast/adguard.com//155ms一般
联通贵州黔南联通Anycast/adguard.com//74ms良好
联通广东清远联通Anycast/adguard.com//189ms一般
联通广东佛山联通Anycast/adguard.com//151ms一般
联通广东韶关联通Anycast/adguard.com//221ms较慢
联通广东揭阳联通Anycast/adguard.com//256ms较慢
联通广东湛江联通Anycast/adguard.com//172ms一般
联通青海西宁联通Anycast/adguard.com//187ms一般
联通青海西宁2联通Anycast/adguard.com//91ms良好
联通四川广安联通Anycast/adguard.com//259ms较慢
联通宁夏银川联通Anycast/adguard.com//2723ms很慢
移动北京移动Anycast/adguard.com//184ms一般
移动天津移动Anycast/adguard.com//197ms一般
移动上海移动Anycast/adguard.com//193ms一般
移动重庆江津移动Anycast/adguard.com//322ms较慢
移动重庆沙坪坝移动Anycast/adguard.com//320ms较慢
移动重庆九龙坡移动Anycast/adguard.com//192ms一般
移动河北石家庄移动Anycast/adguard.com//2725ms很慢
移动河北唐山1移动Anycast/adguard.com//187ms一般
移动河北唐山移动Anycast/adguard.com//31ms优秀
移动河南三门峡移动Anycast/adguard.com//216ms较慢
移动河南漯河移动Anycast/adguard.com//215ms较慢
移动河南驻马店移动Anycast/adguard.com//218ms较慢
移动河南信阳移动Anycast/adguard.com//221ms较慢
移动云南昆明移动Anycast/adguard.com//203ms较慢
移动辽宁鞍山移动Anycast/adguard.com//225ms较慢
移动辽宁大连移动Anycast/adguard.com//190ms一般
移动黑龙江鸡西移动Anycast/adguard.com//212ms较慢
移动湖南永州移动Anycast/adguard.com//200ms一般
移动湖南长沙移动Anycast/adguard.com//193ms一般
移动湖南邵阳移动Anycast/adguard.com//192ms一般
移动安徽池州移动Anycast/adguard.com//153ms一般
移动安徽滁州移动Anycast/adguard.com//180ms一般
移动安徽合肥1移动Anycast/adguard.com//201ms较慢
移动安徽黄山移动Anycast/adguard.com//203ms较慢
移动安徽合肥移动Anycast/adguard.com//44ms优秀
移动山东济南移动Anycast/adguard.com//209ms较慢
移动山东烟台移动Anycast/adguard.com//213ms较慢
移动山东聊城移动Anycast/adguard.com//2469ms很慢
移动山东菏泽移动Anycast/adguard.com//208ms较慢
移动新疆昌吉移动Anycast/adguard.com//249ms较慢
移动新疆伊犁移动Anycast/adguard.com//83ms良好
移动江苏徐州移动Anycast/adguard.com//211ms较慢
移动江苏苏州2移动Anycast/adguard.com//141ms一般
移动江苏泰州移动Anycast/adguard.com//159ms一般
移动江苏盐城2移动Anycast/adguard.com//201ms较慢
移动江苏南通移动Anycast/adguard.com//177ms一般
移动江苏苏州移动Anycast/adguard.com//161ms一般
移动浙江宁波移动Anycast/adguard.com//172ms一般
移动浙江金华移动Anycast/adguard.com//211ms较慢
移动浙江温州移动Anycast/adguard.com//195ms一般
移动浙江杭州移动Anycast/adguard.com//188ms一般
移动江西南昌移动Anycast/adguard.com//199ms一般
移动湖北恩施移动Anycast/adguard.com//211ms较慢
移动广西贵港移动Anycast/adguard.com//211ms较慢
移动广西南宁移动Anycast/adguard.com//183ms一般
移动广西玉林移动Anycast/adguard.com//2707ms很慢
移动甘肃庆阳移动Anycast/adguard.com//2969ms很慢
移动山西太原移动Anycast/adguard.com//204ms较慢
移动山西晋中移动Anycast/adguard.com//187ms一般
移动山西大同移动Anycast/adguard.com//192ms一般
移动内蒙古巴彦淖尔移动Anycast/adguard.com//189ms一般
移动内蒙古呼和浩特移动Anycast/adguard.com//180ms一般
移动内蒙古呼和浩特1移动Anycast/adguard.com//43ms优秀
移动内蒙古包头移动Anycast/adguard.com//375ms较慢
移动陕西西安2移动Anycast/adguard.com//214ms较慢
移动陕西西安1移动Anycast/adguard.com//208ms较慢
移动陕西渭南移动Anycast/adguard.com//2728ms很慢
移动吉林通化移动Anycast/adguard.com//212ms较慢
移动福建厦门2移动Anycast/adguard.com//172ms一般
移动福建漳州移动Anycast/adguard.com//191ms一般
移动福建厦门移动Anycast/adguard.com//192ms一般
移动贵州贵阳移动Anycast/adguard.com//195ms一般
移动贵州黔南移动Anycast/adguard.com//201ms较慢
移动贵州黔南1移动Anycast/adguard.com//198ms一般
移动广东清远移动Anycast/adguard.com//177ms一般
移动广东佛山移动Anycast/adguard.com//184ms一般
移动广东广州移动Anycast/adguard.com//177ms一般
移动广东湛江移动Anycast/adguard.com//181ms一般
移动青海海东移动Anycast/adguard.com//221ms较慢
移动西藏拉萨移动Anycast/adguard.com//253ms较慢
移动四川成都1移动Anycast/adguard.com//158ms一般
移动四川成都2移动Anycast/adguard.com//181ms一般
移动四川乐山移动Anycast/adguard.com//222ms较慢
移动四川广安移动Anycast/adguard.com//191ms一般
移动宁夏银川1移动Anycast/adguard.com//191ms一般
移动宁夏中卫移动Anycast/adguard.com//211ms较慢
移动宁夏银川移动Anycast/adguard.com//96ms良好
海外台湾高雄Anycast/adguard.com//13ms优秀
海外台湾台北Anycast/adguard.com//12ms优秀
海外香港沙田Anycast/adguard.com//1ms优秀
海外香港九龙Anycast/adguard.com//1ms优秀
海外澳门Anycast/adguard.com//0ms优秀
海外卡塔尔Anycast/adguard.com//90ms良好
海外沙特阿拉伯Anycast/adguard.com//88ms良好
海外印度Anycast/adguard.com//106ms一般
海外印度尼西亚Anycast/adguard.com//15ms优秀
海外新加坡Anycast/adguard.com//2ms优秀
海外日本东京Anycast/adguard.com//2ms优秀
海外以色列Anycast/adguard.com//59ms良好
海外韩国Anycast/adguard.com//32ms优秀
海外越南Anycast/adguard.com//53ms良好
海外马来西亚Anycast/adguard.com//11ms优秀
海外菲律宾Anycast/adguard.com//28ms优秀
海外泰国Anycast/adguard.com//27ms优秀
海外韩国Anycast/adguard.com//2ms优秀
海外菲律宾Anycast/adguard.com//34ms优秀
海外英国Anycast/adguard.com//2ms优秀
海外芬兰Anycast/adguard.com//10ms优秀
海外西班牙Anycast/adguard.com//23ms优秀
海外德国Anycast/adguard.com//2ms优秀
海外法国Anycast/adguard.com//9ms优秀
海外波兰Anycast/adguard.com//24ms优秀
海外美国芝加哥‌Anycast/adguard.com//0ms优秀
海外美国华盛顿Anycast/adguard.com//71ms良好
海外美国洛杉矶Anycast/adguard.com//66ms良好
海外巴西Anycast/adguard.com//2ms优秀
海外南非Anycast/adguard.com//2ms优秀
海外澳大利亚Anycast/adguard.com//248ms较慢
海外俄罗斯莫斯科塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited48.4ms优秀
海外柬埔寨金边塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited38.1ms优秀
海外迪拜塞浦路斯/AdGuard Software Limited106ms一般

Ping Test Findings for 94.140.14.59

Tested
Sep 18, 2026, 8:34 PM
Completed probes
320/320
Valid Ping response probes
317 (99.1%)
Average round-trip time
299 ms

This ICMP Ping test against 94.140.14.59 on 2026-09-18 recorded valid Ping responses from 317 of 320 nodes, an overall response rate of 99.1%, with no clear anomaly requiring a change.

94.140.14.59 Ping performance by network

Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Valid Ping response rate

Valid Ping response rate (%)

100%Highest rate
Valid Ping response rateValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.050100Telecom: 98.5%98.5%TelecomUnicom: 98.7%98.7%UnicomMobile: 100%100%MobileOverseas: 100%100%Overseas

P50 round-trip time

Round-trip time (ms)

19 msLowest P50
P50 round-trip timeValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.0150300Telecom: 220 ms220 msTelecomUnicom: 188 ms188 msUnicomMobile: 197 ms197 msMobileOverseas: 19 ms19 msOverseas
Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Key findings

  • Overall RTT was 201 ms at p50, 249 ms at p90 and 333 ms at p95, with most nodes falling in a similar range.
  • Response rates for telecom, unicom and mobile nodes were 98.5%, 98.7% and 100% respectively, showing little difference.
  • Overseas nodes returned much lower RTT values, 19 ms at p50 and 89 ms at p90, a regional difference observed in this run.
  • Three nodes were unanswered and did not obtain the valid Ping response defined for this test; all other nodes responded.

These results describe this distributed test only and do not establish long-term availability, security, or a root cause.