bing.com Ping

Carrier
DNS

Nationwide Ping Latency Map

Nationwide Ping Latency Map
  • Timeout
  • >250ms
  • 201ms-250ms
  • 101ms-200ms
  • 51ms-100ms
  • <=50ms
100%
RegionFastestSlowestAverage
All Nodes澳门 1ms上海数据中心联通 超时78ms
China Telecom广东佛山电信 46ms宿迁电信 超时81ms
China Unicom广东佛山联通 43ms上海数据中心联通 超时77ms
China Mobile上海移动 38ms新疆昌吉移动 236ms79ms
East China上海移动 38ms上海数据中心联通 超时72ms
South China广东佛山联通 43ms广东佛山移动 202ms82ms
Central China湖南郴州电信 57ms湖北襄阳电信 超时74ms
North China天津移动 56ms河北石家庄1电信 超时80ms
Southwest贵州贵阳1联通 59ms云南文山电信 超时78ms
Northwest陕西西安2移动 61ms甘肃兰州电信 超时90ms
Northeast辽宁大连移动 70ms辽宁辽阳电信 超时92ms
HK/MO/TW澳门 1ms台湾台北 5ms3ms

DNS Resolution Stats

2

Showing: 305/305

NodeResponse IPIP LocationResponse Time网络质量
电信湖北十堰电信Home美国/微软公司86ms良好
电信四川广安电信Home美国/微软公司90ms良好
电信河北电信Home美国/微软公司89.9ms良好
电信北京电信Home美国/微软公司79.5ms良好
联通甘肃联通Home美国/微软公司79.2ms良好
联通上海数据中心HomeTimeout超时
海外俄罗斯莫斯科Home美国/微软公司37.7ms优秀
海外柬埔寨金边Home美国/微软公司38.5ms优秀
海外迪拜Home美国/微软公司4.72ms优秀
电信电信青海Home美国/微软公司89.1ms良好
电信宿迁电信HomeTimeout超时
海外美国芝加哥‌Anycast/microsoft.com//1ms优秀
海外巴西Anycast/microsoft.com//2ms优秀
海外卡塔尔Anycast/microsoft.com//10ms优秀
海外美国华盛顿Anycast/microsoft.com//13ms优秀
海外英国Anycast/microsoft.com//3ms优秀
海外沙特阿拉伯Anycast/microsoft.com//22ms优秀
海外澳大利亚Anycast/microsoft.com//2ms优秀
海外芬兰Anycast/microsoft.com//9ms优秀
海外南非Anycast/microsoft.com//1ms优秀
海外西班牙Anycast/microsoft.com//1ms优秀
联通江苏苏州联通Anycast/microsoft.com//73ms良好
海外印度Anycast/microsoft.com//25ms优秀
海外印度尼西亚Anycast/microsoft.com//16ms优秀
海外新加坡Anycast/microsoft.com//2ms优秀
海外德国Anycast/microsoft.com//2ms优秀
海外法国Anycast/microsoft.com//2ms优秀
海外日本东京Anycast/microsoft.com//4ms优秀
移动江西南昌移动Anycast/microsoft.com//99ms良好
联通广东清远联通Anycast/microsoft.com//58ms良好
电信江苏苏州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信云南昆明电信Anycast/microsoft.com//66ms良好
移动广东清远移动Anycast/microsoft.com//187ms一般
联通重庆联通Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
联通湖南岳阳联通Anycast/microsoft.com//73ms良好
海外台湾高雄Anycast/microsoft.com//4ms优秀
电信西藏拉萨1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//114ms一般
电信福建福州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
电信重庆黔江电信Anycast/microsoft.com//66ms良好
电信青海西宁电信Anycast/microsoft.com//94ms良好
电信河北石家庄1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
联通广东佛山联通Anycast/microsoft.com//43ms优秀
电信甘肃兰州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信山西太原电信Anycast/microsoft.com//91ms良好
电信安徽芜湖电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信山东青岛1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//92ms良好
电信上海徐汇电信Anycast/microsoft.com//77ms良好
电信辽宁辽阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信海南三亚电信Anycast/microsoft.com//56ms良好
联通安徽芜湖联通Anycast/microsoft.com//61ms良好
移动重庆江津移动Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
电信湖北襄阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信江苏宿迁电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信重庆江津电信Anycast/microsoft.com//99ms良好
海外波兰Anycast/microsoft.com//1ms优秀
海外以色列Anycast/microsoft.com//3ms优秀
电信浙江宁波电信Anycast/microsoft.com//78ms良好
联通浙江宁波联通Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
联通宁夏银川1联通Anycast/microsoft.com//84ms良好
联通江西南昌联通Anycast/microsoft.com//54ms良好
电信江西南昌电信Anycast/microsoft.com//87ms良好
移动四川成都移动Anycast/microsoft.com//79ms良好
电信黑龙江哈尔冰电信Anycast/microsoft.com//114ms一般
电信内蒙古呼和浩特电信Anycast/microsoft.com//92ms良好
电信浙江杭州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信湖南郴州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//57ms良好
电信湖南长沙电信Anycast/microsoft.com//60ms良好
电信广东广州1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//48ms优秀
电信安徽池州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//79ms良好
移动安徽池州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//51ms良好
海外韩国Anycast/microsoft.com//2ms优秀
联通天津联通Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
移动天津移动Anycast/microsoft.com//56ms良好
联通湖南永州联通Anycast/microsoft.com//61ms良好
联通辽宁铁岭联通Anycast/microsoft.com//94ms良好
电信辽宁铁岭电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
移动湖南永州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//81ms良好
联通山东龙口联通Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
联通河南洛阳联通Anycast/microsoft.com//71ms良好
联通吉林辽源联通Anycast/microsoft.com//92ms良好
电信吉林辽源电信Anycast/microsoft.com//112ms一般
移动广西贵港移动Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
电信广西贵港电信Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
联通河南平顶山联通Anycast/microsoft.com//70ms良好
电信河南三门峡电信Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
联通广东韶关联通Anycast/microsoft.com//55ms良好
电信江苏盐城电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信辽宁沈阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//105ms一般
联通辽宁沈阳联通Anycast/microsoft.com//84ms良好
电信福建厦门电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信江苏泰州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//82ms良好
电信湖南衡阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//71ms良好
电信湖北十堰电信Anycast/microsoft.com//98ms良好
联通河北邯郸联通Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
联通上海联通Anycast/microsoft.com//70ms良好
联通安徽滁州联通Anycast/microsoft.com//73ms良好
移动安徽滁州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//53ms良好
电信安徽滁州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
电信江苏连云港电信Anycast/microsoft.com//80ms良好
联通河北邢台联通Anycast/microsoft.com//82ms良好
电信广东揭阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//57ms良好
移动河北石家庄移动Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
联通山东济宁联通Anycast/microsoft.com//84ms良好
移动广东佛山移动Anycast/microsoft.com//202ms较慢
联通青海西宁联通Anycast/microsoft.com//76ms良好
移动河南三门峡移动Anycast/microsoft.com//61ms良好
电信河南商丘电信Anycast/microsoft.com//80ms良好
电信黑龙江鸡西电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
联通黑龙江鸡西联通Anycast/microsoft.com//105ms一般
联通山东枣庄联通Anycast/microsoft.com//81ms良好
电信山东枣庄电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
联通云南曲靖联通Anycast/microsoft.com//86ms良好
联通浙江杭州联通Anycast/microsoft.com//69ms良好
联通江苏盐城联通Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
电信内蒙古巴彦淖尔电信Anycast/microsoft.com//122ms一般
移动内蒙古巴彦淖尔移动Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
电信江苏徐州1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
联通江苏徐州1联通Anycast/microsoft.com//71ms良好
电信广东佛山电信Anycast/microsoft.com//46ms优秀
电信重庆两江电信Anycast/microsoft.com//88ms良好
移动江苏徐州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//68ms良好
电信广东清远电信Anycast/microsoft.com//56ms良好
移动重庆沙坪坝移动Anycast/microsoft.com//66ms良好
联通河南漯河联通Anycast/microsoft.com//69ms良好
电信陕西西安1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
联通辽宁抚顺联通Anycast/microsoft.com//87ms良好
电信云南文山电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信天津电信Anycast/microsoft.com//102ms一般
移动湖南长沙移动Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
移动陕西西安2移动Anycast/microsoft.com//61ms良好
移动重庆九龙坡移动Anycast/microsoft.com//72ms良好
移动上海移动Anycast/microsoft.com//38ms优秀
移动广东广州1移动Anycast/microsoft.com//185ms一般
移动贵州贵阳移动Anycast/microsoft.com//73ms良好
移动福建漳州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//71ms良好
移动内蒙古呼和浩特移动Anycast/microsoft.com//62ms良好
移动北京移动Anycast/microsoft.com//58ms良好
移动山东济南移动Anycast/microsoft.com//50ms优秀
移动黑龙江鸡西移动Anycast/microsoft.com//80ms良好
联通湖南衡阳联通Anycast/microsoft.com//60ms良好
移动安徽黄山移动Anycast/microsoft.com//49ms优秀
电信安徽黄山电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信河北邢台电信Anycast/microsoft.com//94ms良好
移动吉林通化移动Anycast/microsoft.com//78ms良好
电信浙江嘉兴电信Anycast/microsoft.com//79ms良好
电信江苏无锡电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信福建漳州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//66ms良好
电信福建三明电信Anycast/microsoft.com//88ms良好
移动陕西西安1移动Anycast/microsoft.com//63ms良好
联通陕西西安联通Anycast/microsoft.com//77ms良好
电信四川成都电信Anycast/microsoft.com//82ms良好
电信广东韶关电信Anycast/microsoft.com//58ms良好
电信湖南株洲电信Anycast/microsoft.com//71ms良好
联通吉林梅河口联通Anycast/microsoft.com//104ms一般
电信山东济南电信Anycast/microsoft.com//81ms良好
移动江苏泰州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//75ms良好
电信浙江金华电信Anycast/microsoft.com//110ms一般
电信湖南长沙1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//60ms良好
联通甘肃兰州联通Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
联通山东青岛联通Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
电信安徽安庆电信Anycast/microsoft.com//81ms良好
移动河北唐山1移动Anycast/microsoft.com//61ms良好
联通河北唐山联通Anycast/microsoft.com//80ms良好
移动陕西渭南移动Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
电信陕西渭南电信Anycast/microsoft.com//105ms一般
联通陕西渭南联通Anycast/microsoft.com//93ms良好
电信陕西西安电信Anycast/microsoft.com//75ms良好
电信山东龙口电信Anycast/microsoft.com//80ms良好
联通贵州贵阳1联通Anycast/microsoft.com//59ms良好
联通北京联通Anycast/microsoft.com//85ms良好
移动湖南岳阳移动Anycast/microsoft.com//75ms良好
电信安徽淮南电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
移动湖北恩施移动Anycast/microsoft.com//85ms良好
联通山西长治联通Anycast/microsoft.com//81ms良好
移动四川乐山移动Anycast/microsoft.com//88ms良好
海外台湾台北Anycast/microsoft.com//5ms优秀
移动山东烟台移动Anycast/microsoft.com//64ms良好
移动广西南宁移动Anycast/microsoft.com//69ms良好
电信广西南宁电信Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
电信安徽合肥电信Anycast/microsoft.com//72ms良好
电信浙江绍兴电信Anycast/microsoft.com//73ms良好
电信安徽马鞍山电信Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
移动浙江宁波移动Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
电信内蒙古包头电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
联通内蒙古包头联通Anycast/microsoft.com//95ms良好
移动江苏南通移动Anycast/microsoft.com//46ms优秀
联通河南商丘联通Anycast/microsoft.com//58ms良好
电信辽宁鞍山电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
移动辽宁鞍山移动Anycast/microsoft.com//75ms良好
联通辽宁鞍山联通Anycast/microsoft.com//90ms良好
联通甘肃庆阳联通Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
电信甘肃庆阳1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
移动河北唐山移动Anycast/microsoft.com//67ms良好
电信江苏盐城1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//89ms良好
电信山东青岛电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
移动甘肃庆阳移动Anycast/microsoft.com//89ms良好
电信安徽合肥电信Anycast/microsoft.com//76ms良好
电信河南郑州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//82ms良好
电信广西南宁1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//63ms良好
电信贵州贵阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//61ms良好
电信新疆乌鲁木齐电信Anycast/microsoft.com//124ms一般
电信贵州黔南电信Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
电信西藏拉萨电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信海南海口电信Anycast/microsoft.com//54ms良好
移动河南漯河移动Anycast/microsoft.com//63ms良好
电信河北唐山电信Anycast/microsoft.com//92ms良好
移动浙江金华移动Anycast/microsoft.com//67ms良好
海外越南Anycast/microsoft.com//23ms优秀
联通浙江温州1联通Anycast/microsoft.com//76ms良好
电信浙江温州1电信Anycast/microsoft.com//71ms良好
联通四川广安联通Anycast/microsoft.com//83ms良好
海外马来西亚Anycast/microsoft.com//4ms优秀
电信湖北武汉电信Anycast/microsoft.com//85ms良好
电信河南开封电信Anycast/microsoft.com//103ms一般
电信江苏南通电信Anycast/microsoft.com//76ms良好
联通内蒙古赤峰联通Anycast/microsoft.com//101ms一般
移动西藏拉萨移动Anycast/microsoft.com//94ms良好
移动青海海东移动Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
移动新疆昌吉移动Anycast/microsoft.com//236ms较慢
移动山西太原移动Anycast/microsoft.com//66ms良好
联通甘肃平凉1联通Anycast/microsoft.com//87ms良好
电信江苏南京电信Anycast/microsoft.com//73ms良好
海外菲律宾Anycast/microsoft.com//1ms优秀
联通福建厦门联通Anycast/microsoft.com//59ms良好
移动福建厦门移动Anycast/microsoft.com//69ms良好
电信江西吉安电信Anycast/microsoft.com//84ms良好
电信广西玉林电信Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
移动广西玉林移动Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
电信甘肃平凉电信Anycast/microsoft.com//104ms一般
联通云南昆明联通Anycast/microsoft.com//67ms良好
电信福建宁德电信Anycast/microsoft.com//76ms良好
电信福建泉州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//91ms良好
联通福建宁德联通Anycast/microsoft.com//63ms良好
电信浙江温州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
联通浙江温州联通Anycast/microsoft.com//73ms良好
移动浙江温州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//73ms良好
电信河南驻马店电信Anycast/microsoft.com//90ms良好
移动河南驻马店移动Anycast/microsoft.com//63ms良好
联通河南驻马店联通Anycast/microsoft.com//78ms良好
海外泰国Anycast/microsoft.com//28ms优秀
联通甘肃平凉联通Anycast/microsoft.com//87ms良好
电信广东湛江电信Anycast/microsoft.com//55ms良好
移动广东湛江移动Anycast/microsoft.com//194ms一般
移动贵州黔南移动Anycast/microsoft.com//72ms良好
移动内蒙古包头移动Anycast/microsoft.com//68ms良好
海外韩国Anycast/microsoft.com//4ms优秀
移动河南信阳移动Anycast/microsoft.com//68ms良好
电信浙江衢州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//70ms良好
移动云南昆明移动Anycast/microsoft.com//69ms良好
移动山西大同移动Anycast/microsoft.com//77ms良好
电信江西赣州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
移动四川广安移动Anycast/microsoft.com//96ms良好
电信河南漯河电信Anycast/microsoft.com//92ms良好
联通河南郑州联通Anycast/microsoft.com//77ms良好
移动辽宁大连移动Anycast/microsoft.com//70ms良好
移动山东聊城移动Anycast/microsoft.com//53ms良好
移动山东菏泽移动Anycast/microsoft.com//55ms良好
联通山东菏泽联通Anycast/microsoft.com//86ms良好
移动江苏苏州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//38ms优秀
移动宁夏银川移动Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
联通贵州黔南联通Anycast/microsoft.com//67ms良好
移动浙江杭州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//68ms良好
联通湖南邵阳联通Anycast/microsoft.com//69ms良好
海外澳门Anycast/microsoft.com//1ms优秀
海外菲律宾Anycast/microsoft.com//4ms优秀
电信湖南邵阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//77ms良好
电信四川自贡电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
联通山西运城联通Anycast/microsoft.com//87ms良好
移动湖南邵阳移动Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
移动安徽合肥移动Anycast/microsoft.com//54ms良好
联通河南郑州联通Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
联通河南信阳联通Anycast/microsoft.com//77ms良好
移动宁夏中卫移动Anycast/microsoft.com//73ms良好
联通江苏南京联通Anycast/microsoft.com//74ms良好
电信广西柳州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//67ms良好
电信广东广州电信Anycast/microsoft.com//52ms良好
移动广东广州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//190ms一般
联通广东广州联通Anycast/microsoft.com//48ms优秀
移动广西柳州移动Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
电信青海海东电信Anycast/microsoft.com//89ms良好
联通青海海东联通Anycast/microsoft.com//92ms良好
电信宁夏银川电信Anycast/microsoft.com//92ms良好
电信浙江丽水电信Anycast/microsoft.com//80ms良好
电信河南南阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
移动江西宜春移动Anycast/microsoft.com//72ms良好
电信吉林松原电信Anycast/microsoft.com//100ms良好
联通辽宁盘锦联通Anycast/microsoft.com//93ms良好
移动辽宁盘锦移动Anycast/microsoft.com//75ms良好
电信辽宁盘锦电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信四川绵阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//92ms良好
电信陕西咸阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//94ms良好
联通河南开封联通Anycast/microsoft.com//75ms良好
联通广西贵港联通Anycast/microsoft.com//62ms良好
联通贵州贵阳联通Anycast/microsoft.com//65ms良好
移动浙江温州1移动Anycast/microsoft.com//47ms优秀
联通湖北恩施联通Anycast/microsoft.com//68ms良好
电信河南信阳电信Anycast/microsoft.com//89ms良好
电信岳阳电信电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
海外香港Anycast/microsoft.com//2ms优秀
电信上海奉贤电信Anycast/microsoft.com//71ms良好
联通新疆伊犁联通Anycast/microsoft.com//111ms一般
移动新疆伊犁移动Anycast/microsoft.com//78ms良好
电信湖北咸宁电信Anycast/microsoft.com//Timeout超时
电信北京电信Anycast/microsoft.com//87ms良好
电信河北石家庄电信Anycast/microsoft.com//60ms良好

Ping Test Findings for bing.com

Tested
Oct 11, 2026, 5:16 PM
Completed probes
305/305
Valid Ping response probes
275 (90.2%)
Average round-trip time
71 ms

This ICMP Ping test of bing.com on 2026-10-11 showed an overall node ICMP response rate of 90.2%, with a median RTT of 74 ms and P95 of 105 ms. A low overall response rate and a response-rate gap between telecom and overseas nodes were dete

bing.com Ping performance by network

Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Valid Ping response rate

Valid Ping response rate (%)

100%Highest rate
Valid Ping response rateValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.050100Telecom: 76.8%76.8%TelecomUnicom: 98.6%98.6%UnicomMobile: 100%100%MobileOverseas: 100%100%Overseas

P50 round-trip time

Round-trip time (ms)

4 msLowest P50
P50 round-trip timeValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.050100Telecom: 80 ms80 msTelecomUnicom: 76 ms76 msUnicomMobile: 69 ms69 msMobileOverseas: 4 ms4 msOverseas
Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Key findings

  • The overall node ICMP response rate was 90.2%, below the 98% warning threshold, with 30 of 305 nodes not obtaining a valid Ping response.
  • Telecom nodes had a 76.8% response rate, 23.2 percentage points below the 100% seen for overseas nodes, exceeding the 10-point warning threshold.
  • Unicom and mobile nodes showed response rates of 98.6% and 100%, with median RTTs of 76 ms and 69 ms; no clear anomaly was observed for them in this test.
  • Overseas nodes had a median RTT of 4 ms and P90 of 25 ms, noticeably lower than other carriers, though only 32 nodes were involved.

Improvement recommendations

  • The Ping response rate is 90.2%, below the 98% review threshold. Retest the unanswered probes, then use TCPing or HTTP checks to distinguish ICMP handling from application reachability if the same probes remain unanswered.
  • China Telecom trails overseas by 23.2 percentage points in response rate. Retest both groups with the same probe set, then investigate the affected network or endpoint only if the gap repeats.

These results describe this distributed test only and do not establish long-term availability, security, or a root cause.