bmapi.me Ping

Carrier
DNS

Nationwide Ping Latency Map

Nationwide Ping Latency Map
  • Timeout
  • >250ms
  • 201ms-250ms
  • 101ms-200ms
  • 51ms-100ms
  • <=50ms
100%
RegionFastestSlowestAverage
All Nodes香港沙田 33ms台湾高雄 48ms39ms
China Telecom------
China Unicom------
China Mobile------
East China------
South China------
Central China------
North China------
Southwest------
Northwest------
Northeast------
HK/MO/TW香港沙田 33ms台湾高雄 48ms39ms

DNS Resolution Stats

1

Showing: 34/34

NodeResponse IPIP LocationResponse Time网络质量
海外台湾高雄新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd48ms优秀
海外台湾台北新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd42ms优秀
海外香港沙田新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd33ms优秀
海外香港九龙新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd35ms优秀
海外澳门新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd36ms优秀
海外卡塔尔新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd313ms较慢
海外沙特阿拉伯新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd308ms较慢
海外印度新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd66ms良好
海外印度尼西亚新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd14ms优秀
海外新加坡新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd2ms优秀
海外日本东京新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd82ms良好
海外以色列新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd282ms较慢
海外韩国新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd78ms良好
海外越南新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd50ms优秀
海外马来西亚新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd41ms优秀
海外菲律宾新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd30ms优秀
海外泰国新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd28ms优秀
海外韩国新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd85ms良好
海外菲律宾新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd32ms优秀
海外英国新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd233ms较慢
海外芬兰新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd258ms较慢
海外西班牙新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd238ms较慢
海外德国新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd233ms较慢
海外法国新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd232ms较慢
海外波兰新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd255ms较慢
海外美国芝加哥‌新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd194ms一般
海外美国华盛顿新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd248ms较慢
海外美国洛杉矶新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd167ms一般
海外巴西新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd320ms较慢
海外南非新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd381ms较慢
海外澳大利亚新加坡/新加坡/新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd168ms一般
海外柬埔寨金边新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd38.2ms优秀
海外迪拜新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd73.7ms良好
海外俄罗斯莫斯科新加坡/NewMedia Express Pte Ltd186ms一般

Ping Test Findings for bmapi.me

Tested
Sep 25, 2026, 10:35 AM
Completed probes
34/34
Valid Ping response probes
34 (100%)
Average round-trip time
142 ms

This ICMP Ping test for bmapi.me ran on 2026-09-25 at 02:35 UTC. All 34 overseas nodes returned a valid Ping response, giving a 100% response rate, with a median RTT of 84 ms, P90 of 300 ms, and average of 142 ms. No clear anomaly requiring

bmapi.me Ping performance by network

Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Valid Ping response rate

Valid Ping response rate (%)

100%Highest rate
Valid Ping response rateValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.050100Overseas: 100%100%Overseas

P50 round-trip time

Round-trip time (ms)

84 msLowest P50
P50 round-trip timeValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.050100Overseas: 84 ms84 msOverseas
Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Key findings

  • All 34 overseas nodes returned a valid Ping response, so the node-level response rate was 100% with no unanswered node.
  • Median RTT was 84 ms, P90 300 ms, P95 315 ms, and average 142 ms, indicating most nodes responded quickly while the upper percentiles were notably higher than the median.
  • The telecom, unicom, and mobile carriers supplied no node data this time, so their ICMP response behaviour cannot be compared.
  • All responses came from a single response IP, and the node error count was 0.

These results describe this distributed test only and do not establish long-term availability, security, or a root cause.