lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com Ping

Carrier
DNS

Nationwide Ping Latency Map

Nationwide Ping Latency Map
  • Timeout
  • >250ms
  • 201ms-250ms
  • 101ms-200ms
  • 51ms-100ms
  • <=50ms
100%
RegionFastestSlowestAverage
All Nodes上海联通 146ms上海数据中心联通 超时285ms
China Telecom------
China Unicom上海联通 146ms上海数据中心联通 超时285ms
China Mobile------
East China上海联通 146ms上海数据中心联通 超时279ms
South China广西贵港联通 276ms广东佛山联通 336ms295ms
Central China河南漯河联通 238ms河南平顶山联通 353ms276ms
North China河北唐山联通 259ms山西长治联通 314ms293ms
Southwest云南昆明联通 251ms四川广安联通 292ms269ms
Northwest宁夏银川1联通 242ms青海海东联通 354ms292ms
Northeast黑龙江鸡西联通 254ms辽宁抚顺联通 372ms305ms
HK/MO/TW------

DNS Resolution Stats

1

Showing: 76/76

NodeResponse IPIP LocationResponse Time网络质量
联通北京联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company294ms较慢
联通天津联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company292ms较慢
联通上海联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company146ms一般
联通上海数据中心--Timeout超时
联通重庆联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company255ms较慢
联通河北邯郸联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company269ms较慢
联通河北邢台联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company279ms较慢
联通河北唐山联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company259ms较慢
联通河南洛阳联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company245ms较慢
联通河南平顶山联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company353ms较慢
联通河南漯河联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company238ms较慢
联通河南商丘联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company303ms较慢
联通河南驻马店联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company301ms较慢
联通河南郑州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company245ms较慢
联通河南郑州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company260ms较慢
联通河南信阳联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company307ms较慢
联通河南开封联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company252ms较慢
联通云南曲靖联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company274ms较慢
联通云南昆明联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company251ms较慢
联通辽宁铁岭联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company302ms较慢
联通辽宁沈阳联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company307ms较慢
联通辽宁抚顺联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company372ms较慢
联通辽宁鞍山联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company316ms较慢
联通辽宁盘锦联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company265ms较慢
联通黑龙江鸡西联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company254ms较慢
联通湖南岳阳联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company298ms较慢
联通湖南永州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company259ms较慢
联通湖南衡阳联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company273ms较慢
联通湖南邵阳联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company268ms较慢
联通安徽芜湖联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company297ms较慢
联通安徽滁州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company256ms较慢
联通山东龙口联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company293ms较慢
联通山东济宁联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company301ms较慢
联通山东枣庄联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company361ms较慢
联通山东青岛联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company302ms较慢
联通山东菏泽联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company258ms较慢
联通新疆伊犁联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company353ms较慢
联通江苏苏州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company269ms较慢
联通江苏盐城联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company307ms较慢
联通江苏徐州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company280ms较慢
联通江苏南京联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company290ms较慢
联通浙江宁波联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company306ms较慢
联通浙江杭州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company301ms较慢
联通浙江温州1联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company324ms较慢
联通浙江温州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company233ms较慢
联通江西南昌联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company265ms较慢
联通湖北恩施联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company267ms较慢
联通广西贵港联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company276ms较慢
联通甘肃兰州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company245ms较慢
联通甘肃庆阳联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company312ms较慢
联通甘肃平凉1联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company271ms较慢
联通甘肃平凉联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company312ms较慢
联通甘肃威武联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company299ms较慢
联通甘肃联通美国/加利福尼亚州/洛杉矶/The Constant Company, LLC263ms较慢
联通山西长治联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company314ms较慢
联通山西运城联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company309ms较慢
联通内蒙古包头联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company311ms较慢
联通内蒙古赤峰联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company313ms较慢
联通陕西西安联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company296ms较慢
联通陕西渭南联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company291ms较慢
联通吉林辽源联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company327ms较慢
联通吉林梅河口联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company296ms较慢
联通福建厦门联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company256ms较慢
联通福建宁德联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company261ms较慢
联通贵州贵阳1联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company264ms较慢
联通贵州黔南联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company276ms较慢
联通贵州贵阳联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company271ms较慢
联通广东清远联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company278ms较慢
联通广东佛山联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company336ms较慢
联通广东广州联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company300ms较慢
联通广东韶关联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company284ms较慢
联通青海西宁联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company289ms较慢
联通青海海东联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company354ms较慢
联通四川广安联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company292ms较慢
联通宁夏银川1联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company242ms较慢
联通宁夏银川联通美国/ LLC/洛杉矶/The Constant Company270ms较慢

Ping Test Findings for lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com

Tested
Oct 16, 2026, 10:02 PM
Completed probes
76/76
Valid Ping response probes
75 (98.7%)
Average round-trip time
285 ms

This ICMP Ping test ran on 2026-10-16 against lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com. On the Unicom path, 75 of 76 nodes returned a valid Ping response, a 98.7% response rate, with RTT at 289 ms median, 321 ms P90 and 353 ms P95. No clear anomaly requiri

lax-ca-us-ping.vultr.com Ping performance by network

Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Valid Ping response rate

Valid Ping response rate (%)

98.7%Highest rate
Valid Ping response rateValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.050100Unicom: 98.7%98.7%Unicom

P50 round-trip time

Round-trip time (ms)

289 msLowest P50
P50 round-trip timeValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.0150300Unicom: 289 ms289 msUnicom
Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Key findings

  • The Unicom path showed a node-level ICMP response rate of 98.7%, with 75 of 76 nodes returning a valid Ping response and one unanswered node.
  • Unicom RTT percentiles were 289 ms median, 321 ms P90 and 353 ms P95, with a 285 ms average, indicating a fairly tight distribution.
  • Telecom, Mobile and Overseas paths supplied no node data in this run, so no supported comparison with other carriers is possible.

These results describe this distributed test only and do not establish long-term availability, security, or a root cause.