survival-voice-study.cc.cd Ping

Carrier
DNS

Nationwide Ping Latency Map

Nationwide Ping Latency Map
  • Timeout
  • >250ms
  • 201ms-250ms
  • 101ms-200ms
  • 51ms-100ms
  • <=50ms
100%
RegionFastestSlowestAverage
All Nodes青海西宁2联通 0ms上海奉贤电信 超时127ms
China Telecom贵州黔南电信 3ms上海奉贤电信 超时149ms
China Unicom青海西宁2联通 0ms上海数据中心联通 超时81ms
China Mobile上海移动 38ms天津移动 超时153ms
East China上海移动 38ms上海奉贤电信 超时129ms
South China广东湛江联通 50ms广西贵港移动 超时124ms
Central China湖南郴州电信 56ms河南商丘联通 超时154ms
North China河北唐山电信 22ms天津移动 超时92ms
Southwest贵州黔南电信 3ms重庆江津移动 超时172ms
Northwest青海西宁2联通 0ms陕西西安1电信 超时100ms
Northeast黑龙江鸡西移动 81ms辽宁抚顺联通 超时113ms
HK/MO/TW澳门 1ms台湾高雄 超时13ms

DNS Resolution Stats

2

Showing: 318/318

NodeResponse IPIP LocationResponse Time网络质量
电信天津电信Anycast/vercel.com//103ms一般
电信上海徐汇电信Anycast/vercel.com//72ms良好
电信上海奉贤电信中国/上海/上海/移动Timeout超时
电信上海普陀电信中国/上海/上海/移动Timeout超时
电信重庆黔江电信Anycast/vercel.com//79ms良好
电信重庆江津电信Anycast/vercel.com//226ms较慢
电信重庆两江电信Anycast/vercel.com//215ms较慢
电信河北石家庄电信Anycast/vercel.com//90ms良好
电信河北邢台电信Anycast/vercel.com//99ms良好
电信河北唐山电信Anycast/vercel.com//22ms优秀
电信河北石家庄电信Anycast/vercel.com//81ms良好
电信河北电信美国/亚马逊226ms较慢
电信河南三门峡电信Anycast/vercel.com//228ms较慢
电信河南郑州2电信Anycast/vercel.com//77ms良好
电信河南商丘电信Anycast/vercel.com//225ms较慢
电信河南平顶山电信Anycast/vercel.com//211ms较慢
电信河南南阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//217ms较慢
电信河南郑州电信Anycast/vercel.com//217ms较慢
电信河南开封电信Anycast/vercel.com//229ms较慢
电信河南驻马店电信Anycast/vercel.com//83ms良好
电信河南漯河电信Anycast/vercel.com//84ms良好
电信云南昆明电信Anycast/vercel.com//210ms较慢
电信云南昭通电信Anycast/vercel.com//223ms较慢
电信云南文山电信Anycast/vercel.com//81ms良好
电信云南昆明1电信Anycast/vercel.com//62ms良好
电信云南楚雄电信Anycast/vercel.com//66ms良好
电信辽宁辽阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//107ms一般
电信辽宁铁岭电信Anycast/vercel.com//106ms一般
电信辽宁沈阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//212ms较慢
电信辽宁鞍山电信Anycast/vercel.com//222ms较慢
电信黑龙江鸡西电信Anycast/vercel.com//113ms一般
电信湖南衡阳1电信Anycast/vercel.com//58ms良好
电信湖南郴州电信Anycast/vercel.com//56ms良好
电信湖南长沙电信Anycast/vercel.com//65ms良好
电信湖南衡阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//68ms良好
电信湖南邵阳1电信Anycast/vercel.com//200ms一般
电信湖南株洲电信Anycast/vercel.com//233ms较慢
电信湖南长沙1电信Anycast/vercel.com//219ms较慢
电信湖南岳阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//66ms良好
电信湖南邵阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//192ms一般
电信安徽芜湖电信Anycast/vercel.com//64ms良好
电信安徽池州电信Anycast/vercel.com//74ms良好
电信安徽滁州电信Anycast/vercel.com//74ms良好
电信安徽黄山电信Anycast/vercel.com//72ms良好
电信安徽安庆电信Anycast/vercel.com//203ms较慢
电信安徽淮南电信Anycast/vercel.com//231ms较慢
电信安徽合肥电信Anycast/vercel.com//209ms较慢
电信安徽马鞍山电信Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
电信安徽合肥电信Anycast/vercel.com//230ms较慢
电信山东青岛电信Anycast/vercel.com//205ms较慢
电信山东烟台电信Anycast/vercel.com//88ms良好
电信山东枣庄电信Anycast/vercel.com//209ms较慢
电信山东济南电信Anycast/vercel.com//83ms良好
电信山东龙口电信Anycast/vercel.com//233ms较慢
电信山东青岛电信Anycast/vercel.com//82ms良好
电信新疆哈密电信Anycast/vercel.com//118ms一般
电信新疆乌鲁木齐电信Anycast/vercel.com//107ms一般
电信江苏苏州电信Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
电信江苏宿迁电信Anycast/vercel.com//221ms较慢
电信江苏盐城电信Anycast/vercel.com//195ms一般
电信江苏泰州电信Anycast/vercel.com//87ms良好
电信江苏连云港电信Anycast/vercel.com//236ms较慢
电信江苏徐州电信Anycast/vercel.com//220ms较慢
电信江苏无锡电信Anycast/vercel.com//199ms一般
电信江苏盐城1电信Anycast/vercel.com//219ms较慢
电信江苏南通电信Anycast/vercel.com//240ms较慢
电信江苏南京电信Anycast/vercel.com//64ms良好
电信苏州电信美国/亚马逊75ms良好
电信浙江宁波电信Anycast/vercel.com//206ms较慢
电信浙江杭州电信Anycast/vercel.com//228ms较慢
电信浙江嘉兴电信Anycast/vercel.com//194ms一般
电信浙江丽水电信Anycast/vercel.com//206ms较慢
电信浙江金华电信Anycast/vercel.com//206ms较慢
电信浙江绍兴电信Anycast/vercel.com//194ms一般
电信浙江温州1电信Anycast/vercel.com//213ms较慢
电信浙江温州电信Anycast/vercel.com//217ms较慢
电信浙江衢州电信Anycast/vercel.com//215ms较慢
电信浙江衢州电信Anycast/vercel.com//209ms较慢
电信江西南昌电信Anycast/vercel.com//75ms良好
电信江西吉安电信Anycast/vercel.com//67ms良好
电信江西赣州电信Anycast/vercel.com//230ms较慢
电信湖北襄阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//80ms良好
电信湖北十堰电信Anycast/vercel.com//149ms一般
电信湖北武汉电信Anycast/vercel.com//222ms较慢
电信湖北十堰电信美国/亚马逊207ms较慢
电信广西贵港电信Anycast/vercel.com//203ms较慢
电信广西柳州电信Anycast/vercel.com//63ms良好
电信广西南宁电信Anycast/vercel.com//198ms一般
电信广西南宁1电信Anycast/vercel.com//60ms良好
电信广西玉林电信Anycast/vercel.com//61ms良好
电信甘肃兰州电信Anycast/vercel.com//87ms良好
电信甘肃庆阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//231ms较慢
电信甘肃庆阳1电信Anycast/vercel.com//102ms一般
电信甘肃平凉电信Anycast/vercel.com//93ms良好
电信山西太原电信Anycast/vercel.com//225ms较慢
电信山西晋中1电信Anycast/vercel.com//81ms良好
电信山西晋中2电信Anycast/vercel.com//89ms良好
电信山西晋中电信Anycast/vercel.com//85ms良好
电信内蒙古呼和浩特电信Anycast/vercel.com//76ms良好
电信内蒙古巴彦淖尔电信Anycast/vercel.com//96ms良好
电信内蒙古包头电信Anycast/vercel.com//107ms一般
电信陕西西安1电信Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
电信陕西渭南电信Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
电信陕西西安电信Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
电信吉林辽源电信Anycast/vercel.com//112ms一般
电信吉林松原电信Anycast/vercel.com//118ms一般
电信福建福州电信Anycast/vercel.com//209ms较慢
电信福建厦门电信Anycast/vercel.com//225ms较慢
电信福建漳州电信Anycast/vercel.com//212ms较慢
电信福建三明电信Anycast/vercel.com//68ms良好
电信福建宁德电信Anycast/vercel.com//219ms较慢
电信福建泉州电信Anycast/vercel.com//219ms较慢
电信贵州贵阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//201ms较慢
电信贵州黔南电信Anycast/vercel.com//3ms优秀
电信贵州贵阳电信美国/亚马逊204ms较慢
电信广东广州电信Anycast/vercel.com//197ms一般
电信广东揭阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//196ms一般
电信广东佛山电信Anycast/vercel.com//195ms一般
电信广东广州电信Anycast/vercel.com//206ms较慢
电信广东韶关电信Anycast/vercel.com//211ms较慢
电信广东湛江电信Anycast/vercel.com//198ms一般
电信青海西宁电信Anycast/vercel.com//160ms一般
电信青海海东电信Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
电信青海西宁电信Anycast/vercel.com//85ms良好
电信电信青海美国/亚马逊146ms一般
电信西藏拉萨1电信Anycast/vercel.com//105ms一般
电信西藏拉萨电信Anycast/vercel.com//99ms良好
电信四川绵阳电信Anycast/vercel.com//257ms较慢
电信四川成都电信Anycast/vercel.com//224ms较慢
电信四川自贡电信Anycast/vercel.com//78ms良好
电信四川广安电信美国/亚马逊72ms良好
电信海南三亚电信Anycast/vercel.com//55ms良好
电信海南海口电信Anycast/vercel.com//51ms良好
电信北京电信美国/亚马逊142ms一般
联通北京联通Anycast/vercel.com//86ms良好
联通天津联通Anycast/vercel.com//82ms良好
联通上海联通Anycast/vercel.com//194ms一般
联通上海数据中心--Timeout超时
联通重庆联通Anycast/vercel.com//69ms良好
联通河北邯郸联通Anycast/vercel.com//81ms良好
联通河北邢台联通Anycast/vercel.com//87ms良好
联通河北唐山联通Anycast/vercel.com//75ms良好
联通河南开封联通Anycast/vercel.com//80ms良好
联通河南洛阳联通Anycast/vercel.com//73ms良好
联通河南平顶山联通Anycast/vercel.com//63ms良好
联通河南漯河联通Anycast/vercel.com//79ms良好
联通河南商丘联通Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
联通河南驻马店联通Anycast/vercel.com//70ms良好
联通河南郑州联通Anycast/vercel.com//72ms良好
联通河南郑州1联通Anycast/vercel.com//70ms良好
联通云南曲靖联通Anycast/vercel.com//71ms良好
联通云南昆明联通Anycast/vercel.com//69ms良好
联通辽宁铁岭联通Anycast/vercel.com//89ms良好
联通辽宁沈阳联通Anycast/vercel.com//86ms良好
联通辽宁抚顺联通Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
联通辽宁鞍山联通Anycast/vercel.com//87ms良好
联通黑龙江鸡西联通Anycast/vercel.com//99ms良好
联通湖南岳阳联通Anycast/vercel.com//58ms良好
联通湖南永州联通Anycast/vercel.com//67ms良好
联通湖南邵阳1联通Anycast/vercel.com//58ms良好
联通湖南衡阳联通Anycast/vercel.com//63ms良好
联通湖南邵阳联通Anycast/vercel.com//65ms良好
联通安徽芜湖联通Anycast/vercel.com//60ms良好
联通安徽滁州联通Anycast/vercel.com//63ms良好
联通安徽马鞍山联通Anycast/vercel.com//207ms较慢
联通山东龙口联通Anycast/vercel.com//84ms良好
联通山东济宁联通Anycast/vercel.com//76ms良好
联通山东枣庄联通Anycast/vercel.com//83ms良好
联通山东青岛联通Anycast/vercel.com//80ms良好
联通山东菏泽联通Anycast/vercel.com//86ms良好
联通江苏苏州联通Anycast/vercel.com//66ms良好
联通江苏盐城联通Anycast/vercel.com//74ms良好
联通江苏徐州联通Anycast/vercel.com//76ms良好
联通江苏南京联通Anycast/vercel.com//68ms良好
联通浙江宁波联通Anycast/vercel.com//67ms良好
联通浙江杭州联通Anycast/vercel.com//67ms良好
联通浙江温州1联通Anycast/vercel.com//71ms良好
联通浙江温州联通Anycast/vercel.com//73ms良好
联通江西南昌联通Anycast/vercel.com//57ms良好
联通湖北恩施联通Anycast/vercel.com//72ms良好
联通广西贵港联通Anycast/vercel.com//61ms良好
联通甘肃兰州联通Anycast/vercel.com//81ms良好
联通甘肃庆阳联通Anycast/vercel.com//85ms良好
联通甘肃平凉1联通Anycast/vercel.com//86ms良好
联通甘肃平凉联通Anycast/vercel.com//95ms良好
联通甘肃联通美国/亚马逊79ms良好
联通山西长治联通Anycast/vercel.com//85ms良好
联通山西晋中联通Anycast/vercel.com//82ms良好
联通山西运城联通Anycast/vercel.com//60ms良好
联通内蒙古包头联通Anycast/vercel.com//88ms良好
联通内蒙古赤峰联通Anycast/vercel.com//94ms良好
联通陕西西安联通Anycast/vercel.com//78ms良好
联通陕西渭南联通Anycast/vercel.com//75ms良好
联通吉林辽源联通Anycast/vercel.com//92ms良好
联通吉林梅河口联通Anycast/vercel.com//103ms一般
联通吉林通化联通Anycast/vercel.com//98ms良好
联通福建厦门联通Anycast/vercel.com//62ms良好
联通福建宁德联通Anycast/vercel.com//68ms良好
联通福建福州联通Anycast/vercel.com//69ms良好
联通贵州贵阳联通Anycast/vercel.com//59ms良好
联通贵州黔南联通Anycast/vercel.com//66ms良好
联通广东清远联通Anycast/vercel.com//54ms良好
联通广东佛山联通Anycast/vercel.com//232ms较慢
联通广东韶关联通Anycast/vercel.com//52ms良好
联通广东揭阳联通Anycast/vercel.com//191ms一般
联通广东湛江联通Anycast/vercel.com//50ms优秀
联通青海西宁联通Anycast/vercel.com//81ms良好
联通青海西宁2联通保留0ms优秀
联通四川广安联通Anycast/vercel.com//79ms良好
联通宁夏银川联通Anycast/vercel.com//83ms良好
移动北京移动Anycast/vercel.com//55ms良好
移动天津移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动上海移动Anycast/vercel.com//38ms优秀
移动重庆江津移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动重庆沙坪坝移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动重庆九龙坡移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动河北石家庄移动Anycast/vercel.com//61ms良好
移动河北唐山1移动Anycast/vercel.com//73ms良好
移动河南三门峡移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动河南漯河移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动河南驻马店移动Anycast/vercel.com//773ms很慢
移动河南信阳移动Anycast/vercel.com//851ms很慢
移动云南昆明移动Anycast/vercel.com//748ms很慢
移动辽宁鞍山移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动辽宁大连移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动黑龙江鸡西移动Anycast/vercel.com//81ms良好
移动湖南永州移动Anycast/vercel.com//94ms良好
移动湖南长沙移动Anycast/vercel.com//79ms良好
移动湖南邵阳移动Anycast/vercel.com//92ms良好
移动安徽池州移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动安徽滁州移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动安徽合肥1移动Anycast/vercel.com//238ms较慢
移动安徽黄山移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动安徽合肥移动Anycast/vercel.com//134ms一般
移动山东济南移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动山东烟台移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动山东聊城移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动山东菏泽移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动新疆昌吉移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动新疆伊犁移动Anycast/vercel.com//153ms一般
移动江苏徐州移动Anycast/vercel.com//76ms良好
移动江苏苏州2移动Anycast/vercel.com//43ms优秀
移动江苏泰州移动Anycast/vercel.com//49ms优秀
移动江苏盐城2移动Anycast/vercel.com//73ms良好
移动江苏南通移动Anycast/vercel.com//46ms优秀
移动江苏苏州移动Anycast/vercel.com//41ms优秀
移动浙江宁波移动Anycast/vercel.com//61ms良好
移动浙江金华移动Anycast/vercel.com//51ms良好
移动浙江温州移动Anycast/vercel.com//45ms优秀
移动浙江杭州移动Anycast/vercel.com//41ms优秀
移动江西南昌移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动湖北恩施移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动广西贵港移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动广西南宁移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动广西玉林移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动甘肃庆阳移动Anycast/vercel.com//82ms良好
移动山西太原移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动山西晋中移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动山西大同移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动内蒙古巴彦淖尔移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动内蒙古呼和浩特移动Anycast/vercel.com//91ms良好
移动内蒙古呼和浩特1移动Anycast/vercel.com//52ms良好
移动内蒙古包头移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动陕西西安2移动Anycast/vercel.com//76ms良好
移动陕西西安1移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动陕西渭南移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动吉林通化移动Anycast/vercel.com//90ms良好
移动福建厦门2移动Anycast/vercel.com//83ms良好
移动福建漳州移动Anycast/vercel.com//77ms良好
移动福建厦门移动Anycast/vercel.com//87ms良好
移动贵州贵阳移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动贵州黔南移动Anycast/vercel.com//779ms很慢
移动广东清远移动Anycast/vercel.com//92ms良好
移动广东佛山移动Anycast/vercel.com//70ms良好
移动广东广州移动Anycast/vercel.com//63ms良好
移动广东湛江移动Anycast/vercel.com//89ms良好
移动青海海东移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动西藏拉萨移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动四川成都1移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动四川成都2移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动四川乐山移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动四川广安移动Anycast/vercel.com//120ms一般
移动宁夏银川1移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动宁夏中卫移动Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
移动宁夏银川移动Anycast/vercel.com//115ms一般
海外台湾高雄Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
海外台湾台北Anycast/vercel.com//4ms优秀
海外香港沙田Anycast/vercel.com//23ms优秀
海外香港九龙Anycast/vercel.com//22ms优秀
海外澳门Anycast/vercel.com//1ms优秀
海外卡塔尔Anycast/vercel.com//14ms优秀
海外沙特阿拉伯Anycast/vercel.com//14ms优秀
海外印度Anycast/vercel.com//1ms优秀
海外印度尼西亚Anycast/vercel.com//2ms优秀
海外新加坡Anycast/vercel.com//1ms优秀
海外日本东京Anycast/vercel.com//1ms优秀
海外以色列Anycast/vercel.com//3ms优秀
海外韩国Anycast/vercel.com//3ms优秀
海外越南Anycast/vercel.com//1ms优秀
海外马来西亚Anycast/vercel.com//8ms优秀
海外菲律宾Anycast/vercel.com//Timeout超时
海外泰国Anycast/vercel.com//27ms优秀
海外韩国Anycast/vercel.com//41ms优秀
海外英国Anycast/vercel.com//2ms优秀
海外芬兰Anycast/vercel.com//9ms优秀
海外西班牙Anycast/vercel.com//1ms优秀
海外德国Anycast/vercel.com//1ms优秀
海外法国Anycast/vercel.com//2ms优秀
海外波兰Anycast/vercel.com//19ms优秀
海外美国芝加哥‌Anycast/vercel.com//0ms优秀
海外美国华盛顿Anycast/vercel.com//0ms优秀
海外美国洛杉矶Anycast/vercel.com//0ms优秀
海外巴西Anycast/vercel.com//2ms优秀
海外南非Anycast/vercel.com//2ms优秀
海外澳大利亚Anycast/vercel.com//2ms优秀
海外俄罗斯莫斯科美国/亚马逊17.2ms优秀
海外柬埔寨金边美国/亚马逊37.9ms优秀
海外迪拜美国/亚马逊10.8ms优秀

Ping Test Findings for survival-voice-study.cc.cd

Tested
Sep 16, 2026, 5:41 PM
Completed probes
318/318
Valid Ping response probes
269 (84.6%)
Average round-trip time
115 ms

This ICMP Ping test of survival-voice-study.cc.cd on 2026-09-16 recorded an overall node ICMP response rate of 84.6%, below the 98% reference threshold, with 49 nodes returning no valid Ping response. Mobile showed a 52% response rate, 44.1

survival-voice-study.cc.cd Ping performance by network

Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Valid Ping response rate

Valid Ping response rate (%)

96.1%Highest rate
Valid Ping response rateValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.050100Telecom: 94%94%TelecomUnicom: 96.1%96.1%UnicomMobile: 52%52%MobileOverseas: 93.9%93.9%Overseas

P50 round-trip time

Round-trip time (ms)

2 msLowest P50
P50 round-trip timeValid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.0100200Telecom: 176 ms176 msTelecomUnicom: 75 ms75 msUnicomMobile: 79 ms79 msMobileOverseas: 2 ms2 msOverseas
Valid Ping response rate counts probes that received an ICMP echo response. P50 is the round-trip time at or below which half of valid responses completed; it is not packet-level loss.

Key findings

  • Overall response rate was 84.6%: 269 of 318 nodes returned a valid ICMP echo response, leaving 49 unanswered nodes.
  • Mobile's response rate was 52%, well below Unicom's 96.1%, a gap of 44.1 percentage points.
  • Mobile RTT spread was wide, with p50 at 79 ms and p90 at 340 ms; Unicom measured p50 75 ms and p90 95 ms.
  • Telecom showed p50 176 ms and average 149 ms, higher than Unicom and Mobile at p50, while its 94% response rate was comparatively steady.

Improvement recommendations

  • The Ping response rate is 84.6%, below the 98% review threshold. Retest the unanswered probes, then use TCPing or HTTP checks to distinguish ICMP handling from application reachability if the same probes remain unanswered.
  • China Mobile trails China Unicom by 44.1 percentage points in response rate. Retest both groups with the same probe set, then investigate the affected network or endpoint only if the gap repeats.

These results describe this distributed test only and do not establish long-term availability, security, or a root cause.