172.245.107.209 TCPing

Carrier
DNS

Nationwide Ping Latency Map

Nationwide Ping Latency Map
  • Timeout
  • >250ms
  • 201ms-250ms
  • 101ms-200ms
  • 51ms-100ms
  • <=50ms
100%
RegionFastestSlowestAverage
All Nodes江苏苏州移动 192ms上海移动 超时899ms
China Telecom------
China Unicom------
China Mobile江苏苏州移动 192ms上海移动 超时899ms
East China江苏苏州移动 192ms上海移动 超时586ms
South China广东东莞移动 267ms广西贵港移动 超时1627ms
Central China湖南岳阳移动 269ms河南三门峡1移动 超时1547ms
North China内蒙古包头移动 258ms河北唐山1移动 超时267ms
Southwest贵州黔南移动 277ms重庆九龙坡移动 超时755ms
Northwest陕西西安移动 301ms甘肃威武移动 超时1476ms
Northeast辽宁大连移动 276ms辽宁鞍山移动 超时276ms
HK/MO/TW------

DNS Resolution Stats

1

Showing: 79/79

NodeIP:PortIP LocationResponse Time网络质量
移动北京移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa273ms较慢
移动天津移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa271ms较慢
移动上海移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动上海黄浦移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动重庆江津移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa355ms较慢
移动重庆沙坪坝移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa338ms较慢
移动重庆九龙坡移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动重庆黔江移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa345ms较慢
移动河北唐山1移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动河北唐山移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动河北石家庄移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动河南三门峡1移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动河南漯河移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动河南驻马店移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa4307ms很慢
移动河南信阳移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动河南三门峡移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动云南昆明移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa3336ms很慢
移动辽宁鞍山移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动辽宁大连移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa276ms较慢
移动辽宁盘锦移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动黑龙江鸡西移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动湖南永州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa278ms较慢
移动湖南长沙移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动湖南岳阳移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa269ms较慢
移动湖南邵阳移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa1335ms很慢
移动安徽池州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa281ms较慢
移动安徽滁州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa276ms较慢
移动安徽黄山移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa282ms较慢
移动安徽合肥移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa267ms较慢
移动山东济南移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa266ms较慢
移动山东烟台移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa289ms较慢
移动山东聊城移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa1325ms很慢
移动山东菏泽移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa293ms较慢
移动新疆昌吉移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa3315ms很慢
移动新疆伊犁移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa350ms较慢
移动江苏徐州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动江苏泰州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动江苏南通移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa266ms较慢
移动江苏苏州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa192ms一般
移动浙江宁波移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa252ms较慢
移动浙江金华移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa275ms较慢
移动浙江温州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa245ms较慢
移动浙江杭州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa245ms较慢
移动浙江金华移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa269ms较慢
移动江西南昌移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa4354ms很慢
移动江西宜春移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动湖北恩施移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动广西贵港移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动广西玉林移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动广西柳州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动广西南宁移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动甘肃威武移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动甘肃庆阳移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa2321ms很慢
移动山西太原移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动山西大同移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动内蒙古巴彦淖尔移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动内蒙古呼和浩特移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动内蒙古包头移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa258ms较慢
移动陕西西安2移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动陕西渭南移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa388ms较慢
移动陕西西安移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa301ms较慢
移动吉林通化移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动福建漳州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动福建厦门移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动贵州贵阳移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa1286ms很慢
移动贵州黔南移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa277ms较慢
移动广东清远移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动广东佛山移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa4308ms很慢
移动广东湛江移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动广东广州移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa306ms较慢
移动广东河源移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动广东东莞移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa267ms较慢
移动青海海东移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa1318ms很慢
移动西藏拉萨移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时
移动四川成都移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa287ms较慢
移动四川乐山移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa284ms较慢
移动四川广安移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa283ms较慢
移动宁夏银川移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapa2339ms很慢
移动宁夏中卫移动美国/纽约州/布法罗/HostPapaTimeout超时

TCPing Test Findings for 172.245.107.209

Tested
Oct 27, 2026, 12:28 PM
Completed probes
79/79
Successful TCP connection probes
43 (54.4%)
Average TCP connection time
899 ms

This TCPing test against 172.245.107.209 saw 43 of 79 nodes establish a TCP connection, a 54.4% success rate. Median connection time was 284 ms, while tail latency was notably high, with p95 at 4210 ms.

172.245.107.209 TCPing performance by network

TCP connection success rate counts probes that established a TCP connection. P50 is the connection time at or below which half of successful connections completed; it is not an ICMP Ping result.

TCP connection success rate

TCP connection success rate (%)

54.4%Highest rate
TCP connection success rateTCP connection success rate counts probes that established a TCP connection. P50 is the connection time at or below which half of successful connections completed; it is not an ICMP Ping result.050100Mobile: 54.4%54.4%Mobile

P50 TCP connection time

TCP connection time (ms)

284 msLowest P50
P50 TCP connection timeTCP connection success rate counts probes that established a TCP connection. P50 is the connection time at or below which half of successful connections completed; it is not an ICMP Ping result.0150300Mobile: 284 ms284 msMobile
TCP connection success rate counts probes that established a TCP connection. P50 is the connection time at or below which half of successful connections completed; it is not an ICMP Ping result.

Key findings

  • 36 of 79 nodes did not obtain a valid connection result, giving a 54.4% TCP connection success rate, below the 99% reference threshold.
  • Median connection time was 284 ms, with p90 at 3120 ms and p95 at 4210 ms, exceeding the 2000 ms tail-latency threshold.
  • Only the mobile carrier had usable samples (79 nodes, 43 responses); telecom, unicom and overseas had no node data, so no carrier comparison is possible.
  • All valid responses came from a single response address, and the node error count was 0.

Improvement recommendations

  • The TCP connection success rate is 54.4%, below the 99% review threshold. Retest timed-out probes and verify the tested port, listener, firewall, and security rules only if failures persist.
  • P95 reached 4210 ms, above the 2000 ms review threshold. Retest the slow probes and compare their routes or service stages before changing production configuration.

These results describe this distributed test only and do not establish long-term availability, security, or a root cause.